Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1983No. 66791PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, tried and convicted for burglary, appeals to this court. His sole enumeration of error is that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the trial judge’s charge in the language of OCGA § 16-2-20 (Code Ann. § 26-801) regarding when a person is a party to a crime. Held:

As this court pointed out under the antecedent code section (Code Ann. § 26-801) to our present OCGA § 16-2-20: “A charge on this subject is error only where there is insufficient evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, to support the theory.” Freeman v. State, 130 Ga. App. 718, 720 (3) (204…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Moran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API