Legal Opinion
New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 30, 2004No. 03-7349, 04-1366PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge.
At issue is whether Section 515 (“Section 515”) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1145, requires Defendant-Appellant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) to make certain disputed contributions to the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund (the “Pension Fund”) and the New York State Teamsters Council Health and Hospital Fund (the “Health Fund,” together the “Funds”). Section 515 mandates that an employer make contributions to its multiemployer benefit plans in accordance with the terms of the plans or the terms…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Ausa Life Insurance Company, Bankers United Life Assurance Company, Crown Life Insurance Company, General Services Life Insurance Company, Life Investors Insurance Company of America, Modern Woodmen of America, Monumental Life Insurance Company, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and the Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Ernst and YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Benson v. Brower's Moving & StorageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Independent Fruit & Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004