Legal Opinion

Burroughs-Wellcome Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 17, 1955No. C. D. 1738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The plaintiff in this case imported from Canada certain merchandise,' described on the invoice as “Dried Digitalis Lanata Leaves.” The collector of customs assessed duty thereon at *161the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the eo nomine provision in paragraph 36 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “digitalis.” Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly' dutiable at only 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34 of the said act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as a drug, advanced in value or condition, or, in the alternative, that it is properly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Nylos Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burroughs-Wellcome & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API