Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Hanson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 18, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The first of these bills of exceptions was allowed respecting the denial of a motion made by the plaintiff in scire facias for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The proceeding in which this motion was filed was a scire facias to collect an award of alimony in a divorce proceeding terminated by decree in favor of the libellant in 1895. The motion was supported by affidavits, and no counter affidavits.were filed or other evidence submitted. There was no error of law in the refusal to give rulings requested or in the denial of the motion. The judge may have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Hanzes v. FlavioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Perkins v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Lopes's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Barringer v. NorthridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Thomajanian v. OdabshianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API