Legal Opinion

Drover's National Bank of Union Stock Yards v. O'Hare

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

It is a well settled principle that so long as money or property belonging to the principal, or the proceeds thereof, may be traced and distinguished in the hands of the agent or his representatives or assigns, the principal is entitled to recover it, unless it has been transferred for value without notice. Van Allen v. American National Bank, 52 N. Y. 1, and authorities there cited.

When the proceeds of plaintiff’s property were deposited by his agents with the defendant, an “ ear mark ” was given to the funds, which clearly indicated that they wore impressed with a trust, and that plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Eagle Bank of New-Haven v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State National Bank v. PayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API