Legal Opinion

Geis v. Zylka

Toledo Municipal Court

Decided March 22, 1995No. CVI-94-14578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas J. Osowik, Judge.

The court finds that after hearing, the referee made a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law on February 14, 1995. The referee recommended approval of a proposed settlement offered by the defendant.

The court further finds that the plaintiff timely filed an objection to that recommendation, and the basis of that objection is that the plaintiff should be entitled to a full refund of monies deposited with the defendant.

The plaintiff files her objections to the referee’s report pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E). That rule, in pertinent part, states as follows:

“(2)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. S & D Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Enting Water Conditioning Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Cox v. ParishOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Discover Bank v. OwensCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API