Legal Opinion

American Water-Works Co. v. Venner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1892Published

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the American Water-Works Company of New Jersey against Clarence H. Yenner and another for an accounting. From an order granting a preliminary injunction defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtYan Brunt, P. J.

The complaint in this action alleges the incorporation of the plaintiff in New Jersey, and that on the 1st of May, 1891, it became the owner and entered into possession of certain real and personal property, *380rights, franchises, choses in action, and assets, situated in the states of Nebraska and Colorado, namely, the water-works, franchises, property, estate, and assets which had belonged to a corporation under the similar and same name, organized under the laws of Illinois, and which was known as the “Omaha Water-Works,” by which the cities of Omaha, South Omaha, and Florence, Douglas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Town of Venice v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Allerton v. . BeldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Globe Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. . RealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. T. B.R.R. Co. v. . B., H.T. W. Ry. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API