Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Sood

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 2017No. 16-1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM., Daniel Proctor, an Illinois prisoner who was confined for seven years at Hill Correctional Center, suffers from chronic abdominal pain and spasms in his colon. He sued a number of medical providers working at Hill for Wexford Health Sources— the contractor providing healthcare to Illinois prisoners—as well as several corrections officials, claiming that they violated the Eighth Amendment by not ordering a colonoscopy and endoscopy to diagnose his persistent abdominal pain. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm that decision.

The pertinent facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Tyrone Petties v. Imhotep CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Christopher Pyles v. Magid FahimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Buck v. ObaisiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. ELLIS v. TALBOTDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  3. FLAME-BEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
  4. Greybuffalo, Johnson v. Boughton, GaryDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  5. HUSPON v. MITCHEFFDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API