Legal Opinion

Roemelmeyer v. Richard A. Marshall Insurance Agency

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 1969No. 68-759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was the plaintiff below, who instituted this law suit in order to recover for a loss of property he sustained by virtue of a robbery of his business premises, on the theory that the defendant-appellee negligently failed to execute *754certain insurance binders which would have covered the theft. Trial was had on the issues of liability and damages, after which the jury rendered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages in the amount of $97,556.50. The defendants immediately filed their motion for a new trial, and as grounds therefor, argued that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deese v. White Belt Dairy Farms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Brickley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Tolin Manufacturing Corp. v. Roy Feiner Handbags, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. I. C. Helmly Furniture Co. Ex Rel. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Holdorf v. Charles F. Fry Advertising Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Telophase Nat. Cremation Soc., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Muroff v. DillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. v. SilvaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Parker v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API