Halliburton v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
*1357 ORDER
TIM LEONARD, District Judge.
On July 8, 2013, Joy L. Halliburton and 47 other named plaintiffs filed an action seeking damages in the District Court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs named as defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., two New Jersey companies who are engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, and distributing pelvic mesh products.1 Halliburton v. Johnson & Johnson, Case No. CIV-13-832-L, Petition at ¶ 9 (Doc. No. 1-1). Plaintiffs assert state law claims of negligence, design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, breach of implied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Teague v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Aclin v. PD-RX Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016
- Calderon v. WadeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Fort Gibson State Bank v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Greer v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.