Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Boagni

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1967No. 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff sues to obtain an interpretation of a reservation of royalty in an act of partition between co-owners. The issues are identical to those in a concursus proceeding consolidated with this case for trial and for appeal and decided by us this date. Whitehall Oil Company, Inc. v. Eckart, 197 So.2d 664.

For the reasons assigned in the companion suit cited, we set aside the trial court decree and we interpret the reservation in the partition instrument of November 23, 1942, recorded in Conveyance Book L-7, page 371, Act No. 213418…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitehall Oil Company v. EckartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boagni v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  2. Whitehall Oil Company v. HeardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Whitehall Oil Company v. EckartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Gardner v. BoagniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  5. Boagni v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API