State v. Mosley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
In his first assignment of error defendant argues that the trial court committed prejudicial error in allowing the district attorney to propound to the State’s witness questions which defendant contends were leading. An examination of the questions does not convince us that they fall within the traditional abuse of suggesting the answers or seeking to secure a yes or no answer. The district attorney was either directing the witness’s attention to the subject matter at hand without suggesting an answer or was seeking to aid the witness’s recollection or refresh her memory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.