Legal Opinion

Western Electric Co. v. Hart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts ar.e stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is to recover against defendant, as guarantor, the amount of a certain promissory note, of $1,199.67, made by the Citizens’ Electric Light & Power Company to the plaintiff, and dated March 15, 1892. Three notes were given at the same date (two for $1,000 each, and the note in suit), all signed by the Citizens’ Electric Light & Power Co., Manistee, Mich., George A. Hart, president, and Louis E. Morris, secretary. The following written guaranty was executed and delivered simultaneously with the notes:

“I hereby guarantee the payment at maturity of the following notes given by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craig v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Wylie v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kingman & Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  2. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. RiekeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Emerson-Newton Implement Co. v. CuppsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Morgan v. NowlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API