Legal Opinion
Freeport Randall Co. v. Herman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioners argue that as to leases they entered into with tenants prior to the adoption by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Freeport of a resolution declaring the exis*834tence of an emergency pursuant to subdivision a of section 3 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (ETPA) (L 1974, ch 576, § 4), the act, to the extent that it requires a refund of so much of the rent paid prior to the date of adoption of the resolution as is in excess of the fair market rent determined after such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lipkis v. PikusCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Ardor Management Corp. v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ross v. KeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Wendell Terrace Apts. v. Scruggs-LeftwichDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Matter of Hudson Val. Prop. Owners Assn. Inc. v. City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.