Foust v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Hobson—
Affirming.
Barbara Troxel owned a tract of thiee hundred acres of land in McCreary county on which she and her husband, Washington Troxel, lived. They had only one daughter, Litha, who was the wife of R. L. Foust. She had another daughter, Selina, who was-the wife of Jake Troxel. In 1891 she and her husband were getting old;; Selina had married and was living with her husband on .another farm. Litha was living with her husband on a farm owned by him in Tennessee. The old people proposed to R. L. Foust to deed him the farm on condition that he would…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Owsley v. OwsleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Renaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Farley v. StaceyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Medlock v. SuterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
- Rose v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elkhorn Land & Improvement Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hargis v. Flesher Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Turner v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Phillips v. American Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Kerr v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.