State v. Lacker
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Kent K. Koerner, Judge. (1) The recognizance was in writing and taken by the judge of the court as provided by statutes. The statutes were complied with in every particular and no error appeared.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Kent K. Koerner, Judge. (1) The recognizance was in writing and taken by the judge of the court as provided by statutes. The statutes were complied with in every particular and no error appeared. Sees. 5048, 5134, R. S. .1909; State ■ v. Zwiffle, 22 Mo. 467; State v. Randolph, 22 Mo. 474; State v. Epstein, 186 Mo. 100; State v. Eyerman, 172 Mo. 305. The signatures to the recognizances are sufficient and the recognizance was properly taken. State v. Wilcox, 59 Mo. 176; State v. Stone, 106 Mo. 1; State v. Caldwell, 124 Mo. 509. (2) The judgment…
1Opinion of the Court
ROT, O.
On November 18', 1913, Lacker as principal and Weisman as Ms surety in the court of criminal correction of the city of St. Louis gave bond in the sum of $1500 to secure Ms appearance in the circuit court to answer the charge of felony in stealing from the person of Charles W. LaGrave. On November 22, 1913, an information was filed in the circuit court charging Lacker with having stolen from the. person of said LaGrave a poeketbook worth ten cents and twenty-eight dollars in money. The case was then continued to the December term. On January 5, 1914, the defendant Lacker failed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. AbelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- State v. WoernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862