Legal Opinion

State v. Spencer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 25, 1994No. 32136-6-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Randolph J. Spencer was granted discretionary review of his conviction for one count of brandishing a weapon. He argues that (1) RCW 9.41.270 violates his right to bear arms under the Washington State Constitution, (2) the statute is unconstitutionally vague, and (3) the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. We affirm.

On August 19, 1991, at approximately 10 p.m., Spencer was taking a walk with his dog. He carried his AK-47 semiautomatic rifle, with the clip attached, on his shoulder as he walked. A passing motorist, Verrill Olsen, saw Spencer and noticed that he was "walking briskly and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. JorgensonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API