Shackelford v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Johnson. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Hood. There is nothing in the facts of this case, which are somewhat voluminous, that make their statement necessary to a proper understanding of the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
In this ease appellant was convicted on the charge of having stolen a mule, the property of Ambrose House.
The defendant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for a *139new trial being overruled, it is brought before us on six bills of exceptions, and the following assignments of error: 1st. That “ the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a continuance.” “ 2d. The court erred in the admission of and rejection of testimony, and to the ruling in regard to the closing speech of the district attorney, all as shown in the bills of exceptions.” “3d. The court erred in…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Seebold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- McMichael v. Eckman & VestburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
- Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.