Legal Opinion

MHG Enterprises, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold Guy Fraiman, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding brought by MHG Enterprises Inc., which maintained and operated an amusement park in Flushing, New York, known as the Great Adventure Amusement Park, to compel respondents to pay its relocation costs arising out of the condemna*843tion of the land on which the amusement park was situated. The property for which it seeks relocation costs consists principally of amusement park rides and equipment. The land was condemned as part of the College Point Industrial Park Urban Renewal Project. Respondents are the City of New York, the city’s Public Development Corporation,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saddle Brook Surgicenter, LLC v. All State InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2015
  2. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API