Legal Opinion
(PC) Harris v. Quillen
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 14, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01370Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT BE DENIED ) 14 T. QUILLEN, et al., ) [ECF No. 72] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, filed June 29, 2020.1 20 I. 21 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 22 This…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Owens v. HinsleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.