Cauffield v. Continental Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Branch. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
The plaintiff in error insists that this case resembles and is governed by American Ins. Co. v. Stoy 41 *448Mich. 385, while the defendant relies upon Williams v. Albany City Ins. Co. 19 Mich. 451, in support of the judgment recovered in the court below.
We have very carefully examined this case and those referred to and are of opinion that the present more closely resembles and is governed by the case in 19 Mich. The application in this case is “ for the term of five years from the first day of March, 1878,” and there is nothing therein tending in any way to change or modify this clause or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. Albany City InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- American Insurance v. StoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by3 opinions
- Equitable Insurance Co. v. HarveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Phenix Insurance v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890