Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. El Paso & N. E. R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; A. M. Walthall, Judge. Action by Daniel W. Wiliams against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, in which the El Paso & Northeastern Railroad Company was made a defendant. From a judgment against the first-named defendant, it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
On September 21, 1897, George J. Gould entered into tins contract with Charles B. Eddy: “First. Said Gould agrees to procure to be sold and transferred to said Eddy, bis representatives or assigns, as soon as the legal formalities pertaining thereto will conveniently permit, so much of the roadbed and grading, right of way track and ■all other appurtenances, of what is known as the ‘Old White Oaks Railroad,’ as extends from the intersection of Rand and Main streets, at the crossing of Southern Pacific tracks in the city of El Paso, northeasterly to or towards the boundary line between Texas…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Garrett v. ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Threadgill v. BickerstaffTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Organ v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Morgan v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 1851
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Natland Corp. v. Baker's Port, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Weaver v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Walcott v. KershnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.