Harrison v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
Whether redcaps at the Kansas City, Missouri, Union Station, who have received in tips more than the equivalent of the minimum wages provided for in the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29, Sec. 201 et seq., U.S.C.A., may now prevail in their contention that in addition to what they have received the defendant, the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, as their employer, should pay them in cash minimum wages (and a further like amount as liquidated damages), is the question presented. The question is not altogether novel. A similar question (but with facts differing in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Gross' CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Polites v. BarlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Zappas ex rel. Shereopulos v. RoumelioteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Pickett v. Union Terminal Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hilton Hotels International, Inc. v. Junta de Salario MínimoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Travis v. RayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Thompson v. DaughertyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Walling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.