Legal Opinion

Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Trzcinski

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1996No. 1941615PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cessna Aircraft Company appeals from a judgment entered by the Montgomery County Circuit Court on a jury verdict in Robert Trzcinski's action for damages under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD). The jury awarded Trzcinski $2.5 million in compensatory damages for the injuries he suffered and the medical expenses he incurred in an airplane crash. The jury also awarded $500,000 in punitive damages for Cessna's alleged wanton misconduct. The issue is whether Trzcinski met his burden of proving wanton misconduct by Cessna.

Trzcinski, a pilot with nearly 40 years'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lynn Strickland Sales & Serv., Inc. v. AERO-LANE FAB., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Pitt v. Century II, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Senn v. Alabama Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Luker v. City of BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Kmart Corp. v. BassettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Cheshire v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Town of Gurley v. M & N Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API