Legal Opinion

Brown v. Union Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 15, 1811PublishedCited by 6 opinions

THIS was an action on a policy of insurance to recover for a loss of the cargo of the ship Franklin. The insurance was stated to have been made for the sum of four thousand dollars of said cargo at and from Martinique to the port of destination in the United States, “ from the dangers of the seas, fire, enemies, assailing thieves, restraint and detainment of princes and people, of what nation or quality soever, barratry erf the master or mariners, (unless the assured were…

Read the full summary

THIS was an action on a policy of insurance to recover for a loss of the cargo of the ship Franklin. The insurance was stated to have been made for the sum of four thousand dollars of said cargo at and from Martinique to the port of destination in the United States, “ from the dangers of the seas, fire, enemies, assailing thieves, restraint and detainment of princes and people, of what nation or quality soever, barratry erf the master or mariners, (unless the assured were owners of the vessel,) and from ail other misfortunes and losses that slioaW come to said cargo.” The declaration then…

1Opinion of the Court

Jngersoi.j. J.

Tins was an action brought by Jesse. Brown and .Se» against The Union Insurance Company in Ac» London, (the sanie being an incorporated company for making marine insurance,) to recover for a loss of the cargo of the ship Franklin. The declaration stated, that on tiro 5th day of August, 1808, the plaintiffs were owners ot the cargo to be shipped on board of (he ship Franklin, then lying and being at the island of Martinir/ue, in the West Indies, or bound to Martinique, and from thence to her port of destination in the United Stales. That the plaintiffs proposed to said company,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. United States v. CancholaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  3. Callahan v. NelsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
  4. Chung v. Igloo Products Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
  5. Texas Workforce Commission and RK Resources, LLC and TEI Staffing v. Angie Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API