Sipera v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals from an order denying a petition for postconviction relief made pursuant to Minn. St. 590.01 to 590.06. Convicted of burglary and now serving a sentence imposed therefor, he contends that the evidence used against him was the product of an unlawful search and seizure and that he was denied rights to which he was entitled under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
It appears from the record that about 1:30 a. m. on November 1, 1965, Roseville police officers were notified that a burglar alarm had been set off at the Falcon Heights Pharmacy.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Thunder HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. OlekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. BrazilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- City of St. Paul v. Duane Johnson AnotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.