American Diversified Corp. v. Bureau of Employment Security
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
The issue presented for decision in this case is whether appellant must pay unemployment compensation tax based upon commissions paid certain salesmen. While admitting that the sa]esmen were, “employees” and the. commissions were “wages,” as defined in the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December-5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P. L. 2897, 43 P.S. 751, the appellant claims to be free from the tax under either one. or both of the following two provisions of the same act:. . Services . performed by an individual for wages shall be deemed to be employment subject to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. Hecker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crenshaw v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- C. A. Wright Plumbing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. KesslerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kurbatov v. Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cameron v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.