Enriquez v. State

JOHNSON, J.,

filed a dissenting opinion in which MEYERS, J., joined.

I respectfully dissent. The majority states that “the appellate court must examine the entire record instead of plucking certain evidence from the record and examining it in a vacuum.” Ante, at 278. Yet, the majority appears to be “plucking.”

According to the Court of Appeals’ opinion note, the evidence established that the chemist tested the contents of one of the bundles recovered; but that sh'e did not chemically test the other bundles. Enriquez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 899, 903 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] 1999). As the…