Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1952No. 15349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

Ed G. Max, acting temporary administrator of the estate of Mary M. Bowman, deceased, petitioned the probate court of Tarrant County to determine whether a written instrument signed by Mary M. Bowman should be admitted to probate as a will.

Charlotte Goldman and husband and Harry Loyd Max filed their opposition to the admission to probate of said instrument, and alleged that they, with Ed G. Max, their brother, were nephews and niece of Mary M. Bowman and were all and the only heirs to her estate.

An intervention was filed by Forrest Campbell and twenty-one others, asserting they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Fowler v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Johnson Aircrafts, Inc. v. WilbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Smith v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Williams v. Southern Life & Health Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eddleman v. ScalcoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Bowden v. CaldronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API