Urffer v. Urffer

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The libel in this action charged cruel and barbarous treatment, and indignities. The master found the latter charge sustained by the evidence and recommended a decree of divorce on that ground. The lower court concluded that t'he testimony of libellant and respondent were in balance; that both were to blame (as in Nagin v. Nagin, 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 198, 22 A. 2d 78) and dismissed the libel on the ground that libellant had not met the burden of proof by clear and satisfactory evidence. The record in this case is formidable and in the three volumes of testimony the issue is…