Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Robinson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2015PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, P.J.:

Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the orders entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, which precluded the testimony of the victims at trial because the Commonwealth refused to provide written transcripts of the victims’ video interviews. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The relevant facts and procedural history of these consolidated appeals are as follows. Appellee Robinson was charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (“IDSI”) — forcible compulsion, three counts of unlawful contact with a minor, five…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. McGillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Com. v. Ligon, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Benvenisti-Zarom, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Benvenisti-Zarom, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Ligon, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API