Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parks v. Dittmar (In Re Dittmar)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2009No. BAP Nos. KS-08-002, KS-08-003, KS-08-004, KS-08-005, KS-08-006, KS-08-007, KS-08-008, KS-08-009. Bankruptcy Nos. 05-17094, 05-15334, 05-15333, 05-16951, 05-17430, 05-15728, 05-16484, 05-14936Published

1Dissent

BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I believe the appropriate analysis to apply in this case is to determine: (1) whether the Debtors acquired contingent rights to the SARS distributions prepetition under the CBAs; and, if so, (2) whether the distributions were based, at least in part, on the prepet-ition employment of Debtors. The legal effect of the CBAs, including Debtors’ interests thereunder, must be determined in accordance with federal common law governing labor contracts and not state law. Applying that law, I determine the EPP provisions of the CBAs to be…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API