Legal Opinion

State v. McGuff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1918No. 14926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Holden, J., entered March 26, 1917, upon a trial and conviction of forgery.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant was put to trial upon a charge of forgery. The. charging part of the information is as follows:

“That he, the said Peter McGuff, on the 13th day of December, 1916, did then and there feloniously forge a writing, on paper, the said writing on paper being then and there an instrument by which the title of personal property was evidenced, created, acknowledged and transferred, the same being a request for the payment of money of the tenor following:
“ ‘Counter Check.
“North Yakima, Wash., Dec. 13, 1916. No.....
“The Yakima National Bank — Pay to the order of Peter McGuff $15.00.
“Fifteen....…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Poncin v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. CottrellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. O'Brien v. McKelveyWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. FernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. State v. O'DELLWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. BrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API