Legal Opinion

Cruz v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1965No. 21523PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams

Cornelius Joseph Cruz was convicted of aggravated robbery and in connection therewith was sentenced to a term in the State Penitentiary. During the trial Cruz was represented by court-appointed counsel, Cruz being an indigent person and hence unable to retain counsel of his own choosing.

Pursuant to the mandate contained in Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S. Ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891, Cruz upon order of the trial court was thereafter given at his request a free transcript of the record of his trial, but his further request that counsel be appointed to represent him on writ of error was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ruark v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Cruz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Ruark v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hammershoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Murphy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. ShepardColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Cruz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Murphy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API