Cronkleton v. Lane
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of the appellants to vacate a default judgment, so that they could defend the action on the merits. This motion was filed during the term, but no hearing was held thereon until after the expiration of the term of court. The only question for determination is the *18power of the district court to vacate a judgment after the term of court has adjourned.
This identical question was recently presented to this court in Lyman v. Dunn, 125 Neb. 770, 252 N. W. 197. The question was fully discussed ■ there, and the previous decisions…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lyman v. DunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanton v. StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Meier v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Reikofski v. ReikofskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Shipley v. McNeelNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Gasper v. MazurNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.