Legal Opinion

Yuan Jen Cuk v. Lackner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1976No. 75-1457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

A three-judge district court was convened in 1972 to decide the constitutionality of California’s statutory eligibility requirements for certain state medical payments (Medi-Cal). In a written opinion filed June 29, 1972, the court held the challenged statute unconstitutional. The opinion then said the enforcement of the statute should be enjoined, and directed the originating judge to prepare supplemental orders to fashion certain affirmative relief which the three-judge court deemed appropriate.

This appeal challenges the single-judge order which spelled out the affirmative relief, primarily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Thoms v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Molpus v. FortuneDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  4. David L. Molpus, Cross-Appellants v. Porter L. Fortune, Jr., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yuan Jen Cuk v. LacknerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API