Legal Opinion

Royall v. Bolster

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 24, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00248Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Alan Marcus Royall, ) Petitioner, ) 1:19¢cv248 (AJT/JFA) Mark J. Bolster, Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Alan Royall, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 42 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging on due process grounds disciplinary proceedings he faced at Federal Correctional Complex (FCC) Petersburg. [Dkt. No. 1]. He claims that his due process rights were violated because the prison failed to furnish the written report explaining the result of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Jerome Williams v. Jon OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Carl Gordon v. Fred SchillingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API