Legal Opinion

Paliotto v. Town of Islip

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for an order to strike ont certain parts of the answer: three affirmative allegations and one affirmative defense, as sham, frivolous, irrelevant, redundant and unnecessary (Buies Civ. Prae., rule 103), and, furthermore, the said affirmative defense as insufficient in law (Buies Civ. Prae., rule 109).

In paragraphs 8, 9 and 11 of their answer, defendants, after admitting some of the allegations contained in paragraphs 14 and 30 of the complaint, defy the rules of pleading by affirmatively alleging certain matters in their denials, by attempting to plead a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Rodgers v. . ClementNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Smith v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Paliotto v. Town of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Davlee Construction Corp. v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walton v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API