State v. Rose
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
112 N.J. 454 (1988)
548 A.2d 1058
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TEDDY ROSE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 2, 1988.
Decided September 22, 1988.
Matthew Astore, Deputy Public Defender, II, and Patricia A. Kern, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).
Hilary L. Brunell, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Herbert H. Tate, Jr., Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Hilary L. Brunell, Elizabeth A. Duelly, Marc J. Friedman, Frederick Gerson, Virginia M. Lincoln, Donald J. Sears,…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.