Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Farwell

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1892No. 14,467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Alameda County; John Ellsworth, Judge. Action by C. H. Berlin against Elizabeth Farwell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

FOOTE, C.

This action was brought against the defendant for the purpose of recovering certain commissions alleged to have been earned by the plaintiff in finding a purchaser in the person of Mr. H. D. Bacon for certain lands which Mrs. Farwell had in writing trusted to the plaintiff to sell for her at a certain price. The court below determined the matter adversely to the plaintiff’s claim, and from the judgment made and given in the premises this appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The plaintiff and appellant claims that the court below was not justified by the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carman v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Kronenberger v. FrickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Burnham City Lumber Co. v. RannieSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API