Legal Opinion

Kaushal v. Singh

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 24, 2017No. 2017 NYSlipOp 50346(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Indra Kaushal, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Amarjit Singh, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff, as limited by her brief, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anthony Cannataro, J.), entered on March 17, 2016, after a jury trial, as limited her recovery of damages to the principal sum of $10,000.

2Per curiam

Judgment (Anthony Cannataro, J.), entered on March 17, 2016, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs.

We find no basis to disturb the jury's verdict with regard to damages, since plaintiff presented no proof that she sustained "out of pocket"…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Clearview Concrete Products Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Kumiva Group, LLC v. Garda USA Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Sheth v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API