Legal Opinion

Coleman v. ARRINGTON AUTO SALES & RENTALS

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 27, 2008No. A08A0981PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Courtney Coleman sued Arrington Auto Sales & Rentals, complaining that Arrington had wrongfully repossessed the car it sold to him. The trial court granted summary judgment to Arrington on the ground that Coleman’s breach of contractual payment obligations allowed the repossession. Coleman appeals, but has shown no error. We affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Kellos v. Parker-Sharpe, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. UniFund Financial Corp. v. DonaghueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Williams v. National Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Willesen v. Ernest Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Lovell v. Georgia Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. McKinley v. Coliseum Health Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Rosen v. Protective Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API