Rainey v. Oregon Short Line R.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
Catherine Rainey and Peter L. Rainey, her husband, pursuant to the statutes of Idaho, commenced this action in the district court of Salt Lake county as plaintiffs against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries, which, it is alleged, Catherine Rainey sustained through the alleged “wanton and willful” negligence and misconduct of defendant’s employees. In view that no damages are sought on behalf of Peter L. Rainey for any injury he sustained, Catherine Rainey will be considered as the sole plaintiff in this action.
The defendant answered the complaint denying the alleged…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Isabel v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Frye v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grizzell v. Hartman Enterprises, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Daley v. Salt Lake & U. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1926