Legal Opinion

Decker v. Stimson Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1903No. 4497PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

— Action for personal injuries. The lower' court granted a nonsuit, on motion of respondent, after the plaintiffs evidence was all in, and dismissed the action. The appellant was employed by respondent for the purpose of rolling logs from a log chute to a logging deck in respondent’s saw mill. Appellant had been engaged in this and other work for respondent several months, and was an experienced man at the business. On the second day of October, 1901, appellant undertook to roll a long log from the chute to the logging deck by means of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. American Foundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Moulton v. GageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Bullivant v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graves v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Woole v. Washington Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Miller v. Moran Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Daffron v. Majestic Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Johnston v. Northern Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API