Legal Opinion

Kuck Et v. Sommers Et

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1950No. 485PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By DOYLE, J.

To here review the lengthy pleadings and the hundreds of factual situations to which one’s attention is directed in this appeal on questions of law and fact, would be productive of no worthwhile result, so far as making clear the real issues and the equitable principles which are to be invoked for a decision in this case. They are well-known to counsel and need not be here repeated. It is sufficient, we think, to say that appellees (plaintiffs below) are seeking, by way of judgment in this court, to establish a trust for their benefit in property bought at a mortgage…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. OwensOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. U.S. Bank National Association v. MarcinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. KochOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Sherwin v. Oil City National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Farr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API