Legal Opinion

Fultz v. McKnight

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 1923No. 11255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

On February 6, 1922, respondents here served notice of intention to appeal to the Circuit Court from a decree of the Probate Court of Berkeley County admitting a will to probate in due form of law. No “certified copy of the record of the proceedings appealed from and of the grounds of the appeal filed in the Probate Court,” together with “proper evidence” of notice of appeal “given the adverse party according to law,” was filed in the Circuit Court, as required by section 64, Code Civ. Proc. 1912, prior to the “stated session next…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rylee v. Marett, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Watson v. PollitzerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howell v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Thompson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. Boggs-Tate Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Henson v. WolfeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Howell v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API