Spaulding v. . Strang

It was found as a fact by the learned judge who tried this action at Special Term, that the agreement between Bradner Furman and a part of their creditors, dated the 16th of November, 1854, and their several assignments for the benefit of creditors on the first of December following, constitute parts of one and the same transaction, and, for that reason, as matter of law, "that said instruments were fraudulent and void as to the plaintiff and his judgment." Whether this legal conclusion can be sustained, presents the only question to be examined on this appeal.

It is not pretended that the…