Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 24, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSlights, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In a truly extraordinary challenge to the Court’s inherent power to enforce its orders, manage its affairs and achieve the orderly disposition of its business, the State has taken the position that the Court is without authority to order the production of discovery, including the report from the Office of the Medical Examiner (“ME Reports”), by a date certain in advance of trial. The State argues that no such authority can be found in the Court’s rules of criminal procedure and, therefore, the authority does not exist. The Defendant has moved the court to enforce its previous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Middlebrook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. State v. McElroySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. United States v. Sean McSherryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Division of Family Services v. A.B.Delaware Family Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API