Legal Opinion

GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 12, 1996No. 96-1663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, Michael and Drue Gisvold appeal an order denying their attempted redemption and allowing the successful bidders at the sheriffs sale to complete the purchase. The Gisvolds argue that the trial court lacked the authority to allow the purchase to be completed after the bidders failed to deposit the remainder of the purchase price within the required period under § 846.17, STATS. Because we conclude the trial court has no discretion to waive the requirements of § 846.17, the attempted purchase was forfeited and the Gisvolds' redemption was valid.

The facts are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Frederick v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Frick v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gumz v. ChickeringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gerhardt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GisvoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re WescottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API