Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1929No. Docket No. 1615PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

Since the appeal from the judgment and an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial was perfected the appellant has died. The question now under consideration is: What is or should be the effect of his death upon the proceedings? Counsel for appellant argues that this court should proceed to a determination of the merits of the appeal in order that the reputation of the deceased may not be wrongfully assailed, assuming of course, as he does, that such a consideration would result in a reversal. The argument we think proceeds from a wrong premise. What…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PomeroyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  2. Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  3. United States v. DunneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  4. United States v. MitchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1908
  5. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. State v. PichetteMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. MountCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API