People v. Alexander
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
Since the appeal from the judgment and an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial was perfected the appellant has died. The question now under consideration is: What is or should be the effect of his death upon the proceedings? Counsel for appellant argues that this court should proceed to a determination of the merits of the appeal in order that the reputation of the deceased may not be wrongfully assailed, assuming of course, as he does, that such a consideration would result in a reversal. The argument we think proceeds from a wrong premise. What…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PomeroyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- United States v. DunneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1908
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. PichetteMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. MountCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021